HomeBlogPage 418

DUJ Condemns New Murder Case Against Journalists, Demands Immediate Withdrawal

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

Dhaka, April 3, 2025: The Dhaka Union of Journalists (DUJ) has strongly condemned the filing of another murder case against journalists, terming it an attempt to suppress press freedom. In a statement issued today, DUJ leaders expressed outrage over the recent case filed against six journalists in Bogura, including allegations against journalist Sheikh Hasibul of the Daily Swadhin Bangla.

DUJ President and General Secretary stated that such legal actions are being strategically used to intimidate journalists and hinder free reporting. The organization demanded an immediate withdrawal of the case and called for ensuring a safe working environment for journalists in Bangladesh.

DUJ Protests Arrest of Kushtia Journalist Leader

Meanwhile, DUJ also condemned the recent arrest of Kushtia Journalists’ Union General Secretary Mahmud Hasan Bunia. He was detained from his residence on April 2, which the DUJ believes is an unjustified attempt to silence journalists. DUJ leaders emphasized that suppressing journalists through legal harassment is unacceptable and urged the authorities to ensure press freedom in the country.

The statement was signed by DUJ General Secretary Lakan Sen Gupta Tuku, reaffirming their commitment to stand by the journalist community and resist any oppressive actions against the media.

Bangladeshi American Diaspora Urges UN to Investigate Volker Türk Over Alleged Overreach

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

New York, April 4, 2025 – A group representing the Bangladeshi American diaspora has formally requested the United Nations (UN) to investigate and suspend Volker Türk, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, for allegedly exceeding his authority and interfering in Bangladesh’s internal affairs. The demand comes after Türk’s statements on BBC HARDtalk, where he reportedly warned the Bangladesh Army about potential repercussions, including bans from UN peacekeeping missions, during the political unrest of July and August 2024.

In a letter addressed to UN Secretary-General António Guterres, the diaspora group accused Türk of breaching Article 2(7) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the organization from intervening in a member state’s domestic matters. The signatories argue that Türk’s comments may have directly influenced Bangladesh’s political transition, leading to the resignation of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the rise of an interim government led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus.

The letter further asserts that Türk’s actions went beyond the mandate of his position and lacked the necessary authorization from the UN Security Council or the Department of Peace Operations (DPO). They claim his remarks created an undue influence on Bangladesh’s military leadership at a critical political juncture, potentially affecting the democratic stability of the country.

Concerns Over OHCHR’s Report on Bangladesh

The letter also criticizes the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) for alleged bias in its report on the 2024 protests. The signatories claim that the report disproportionately blamed the Awami League-led government for human rights abuses while failing to acknowledge the widespread violence carried out by opposition groups, Islamist militants, and criminal elements.

According to the letter, the OHCHR’s omissions include:

Mob violence and killings at universities following the protests.

Arson attacks targeting businesses, homes, and industries affiliated with the Awami League.

Targeted assassinations of Awami League supporters, escalating political tensions.

The release of Islamist militants from prison, allegedly playing a role in the unrest.

The alleged involvement of Muhammad Yunus in orchestrating the protests, raising concerns about external political influences.

The letter also points to confessions from protest organizers who admitted to violent acts, including arson and murder, calling into question the objectivity of the OHCHR’s findings.

Call for Independent Investigation

The Bangladeshi American diaspora group has urged the UN to take the following immediate actions:

  1. Launch a transparent and independent investigation into Türk’s role in Bangladesh’s political transition and his potential conflicts of interest.
  2. Suspend Volker Türk from his position while the investigation is conducted.
  3. Examine potential bias in the OHCHR’s reports and ensure future UN assessments on Bangladesh provide a balanced view.
  4. Investigate any personal or political affiliations between Türk and Muhammad Yunus that may have influenced his decisions.

Implications for the UN’s Credibility

The controversy surrounding Volker Türk raises broader concerns about the UN’s role in maintaining neutrality and respecting national sovereignty. If proven that Türk acted beyond his mandate, this could set a dangerous precedent for UN officials engaging in political interventions in sovereign states.

The global community, especially countries contributing troops to UN peacekeeping missions, will closely watch how the UN addresses these allegations. Failure to ensure accountability could impact trust in the organization’s ability to function impartially on international matters.

As the call for an inquiry gains momentum, it remains to be seen how the UN leadership will respond to the demands for transparency and accountability regarding its human rights operations.

Press Conference in Geneva Highlights Human Rights Violations in Bangladesh

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

A high-profile press conference held at the Geneva Press Club has brought renewed international attention to the worsening human rights situation in Bangladesh. Organized by the All European Freedom Fighter Sangsad, the event focused on the persecution of ethnic minorities, suppression of journalists and writers, and broader concerns regarding the country’s democratic decline.

Legal Experts and Activists Condemn Repressive Measures

The press conference featured a panel of distinguished legal experts, political figures, and human rights activists, all of whom voiced concerns over escalating state repression in Bangladesh. Mr. Aminur Rahman Khosru, President of the All European Freedom Fighter Sangsad, chaired the event, emphasizing the growing threats to free speech and minority rights.

Mr. Fazlur Rehman Afridi, a human rights activist with an international NGO, moderated the discussion, highlighting the importance of global solidarity in addressing Bangladesh’s deteriorating civil liberties.

In his keynote speech, Mr. Paulo Casaca, former Member of the European Parliament (MEP) and Executive Director of the South Asia Democratic Forum (SADF), criticized the Bangladeshi government’s increasing authoritarianism. He pointed to widespread political oppression, arrests of journalists, and violence against minority communities as key indicators of Bangladesh’s democratic backsliding.

Crackdown on Journalists and Digital Suppression

The panelists condemned the Digital Security Act (DSA), describing it as a weapon used by the Bangladeshi government to silence dissenting voices. Barrister Tania Amir, a Supreme Court lawyer and constitutional scholar, argued that the law enables arbitrary arrests and criminalizes free expression, severely undermining democracy.

Lawyer and blogger Nijum Mojumder detailed how digital activists face constant surveillance, harassment, and legal threats, leading many to flee the country. “Bloggers and journalists are being treated as criminals simply for expressing their opinions,” he said.

Persecution of Ethnic and Religious Minorities

The oppression of religious and ethnic minorities was another focal point of the discussion. Mr. Puspita Gupta, President of the Bangladesh Secular Movement in the UK, provided evidence of land grabs, mob violence, and religious persecution targeting Hindu, Buddhist, and indigenous communities. He accused Bangladeshi authorities of failing to protect these vulnerable groups and called for urgent international intervention.

Political Suppression and Democratic Concerns

The speakers also addressed the arbitrary detention, forced disappearances, and extrajudicial killings of opposition figures in Bangladesh. Mr. Nazrul Islam, President of the All European Awami League, acknowledged the need for security but urged the government to stop using force to suppress political dissent.

Calls for International Action

The panelists called upon European policymakers, the United Nations, and global human rights organizations to:

Increase diplomatic pressure on Bangladesh to repeal repressive laws.

Support independent media and human rights defenders facing persecution.

Hold Bangladeshi authorities accountable through international legal mechanisms.

Launch awareness campaigns to highlight the deteriorating human rights situation.

The conference concluded with a strong call for coordinated international efforts to address Bangladesh’s human rights crisis. Speakers emphasized that without immediate action, the country risks further political instability and suppression of fundamental freedoms.

World Leaders React to Trump’s Tariff Imposition

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

The decision by the United States to impose new tariffs on all imported goods has been described as a major blow to the global economy by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Her statement aligns with the stance of several countries, including China, which has announced that it will take strict countermeasures against the U.S. in response.

However, Donald Trump has defended his actions, stating that these measures are a form of retaliation against unfair trade policies. He claimed that his decisions were made with considerable generosity.

Trump further stated that these tariffs would boost U.S. manufacturing. On Wednesday, he remarked that the move would make America “wealthy again.”

On Thursday morning, von der Leyen warned that the imposition of new tariffs would increase uncertainty, leading to severe consequences for millions worldwide. She emphasized the impact on the most vulnerable nations, pointing out that the U.S. had imposed the highest tariffs on those at the greatest risk.

The European Commission chief assured that Europe would respond collectively and warned that if negotiations failed, the European Union was prepared to take countermeasures. She stated, “If you go against one of us, you go against all of us.”

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni criticized the decision as a mistake but indicated that she would work on a deal with the U.S. to prevent a trade war.

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez expressed his concerns, affirming Spain’s commitment to an open world economy. Meanwhile, Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin described Trump’s decision as “deeply regrettable” and not beneficial to anyone.

French President Emmanuel Macron is scheduled to meet with representatives from the affected business sectors at the Élysée Palace to discuss the consequences of the new tariffs.

China’s Ministry of Commerce has urged the U.S. to immediately revoke the tariffs and has vowed to take firm countermeasures to protect its rights and interests.

Taiwan, which faces a 32% tariff on its exports to the U.S., has called the move “highly unreasonable.” Taiwanese Prime Minister Cho Jung-tai stated that his government would lodge a strong protest with the U.S.

South Korea’s interim President Han Duck-soo remarked that a global trade war is becoming a reality. His government is looking for ways to mitigate the crisis, as South Korea has been hit with a 25% tariff.

Japan has expressed disappointment over the 24% tariff imposed on its exports, stating that it may violate agreements under the World Trade Organization and existing U.S.-Japan trade deals. Similarly, Thailand announced that it would enter discussions with the U.S. over its 36% tariff.

Israeli media reported that economic officials in Israel were shocked by the U.S. tariff imposition. Israel had previously eliminated tariffs on U.S. imports, but now it faces a 17% tariff on its exports.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese warned that American consumers would bear the highest cost of these unfair tariffs. He clarified that his government would not engage in retaliatory actions, stating, “We will not participate in a competition that raises prices and slows down economic growth.”

A source from Downing Street noted that the lower tariffs imposed on the U.K. reflected the British government’s recent efforts to secure a trade deal with the U.S.

Britain’s Trade Minister Jonathan Reynolds stated that his government was interested in negotiating an economic agreement with the U.S. to strengthen fair and balanced trade relations between the two countries.

Tulip Siddiq Accuses Bangladesh Authorities of False Allegations and Media Smear Campaign

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

British MP Tulip Siddiq has accused the Bangladesh authorities of making false allegations against her in the media without directly reaching out to her. She claims that for months, the authorities have been conducting a smear campaign against her without providing any substantial evidence or contacting her for clarification.

Siddiq revealed that more than two weeks ago, her legal team sent an official letter to the Bangladeshi authorities, urging them to stop spreading baseless accusations and inviting them to raise any legitimate concerns they might have. However, she stated that the deadline for their response has passed, and no reply has been received.

Continued Smear Campaign

Instead of engaging in direct communication, Siddiq alleges that the Bangladesh authorities continue to propagate misleading and defamatory statements through the media. “I have provided detailed rebuttals to all allegations made through the media, acting in good faith, yet they have not shown the same courtesy,” she said, criticizing the one-sided nature of the accusations.

She also questioned the integrity of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in Dhaka, emphasizing that if they genuinely had any questions, they knew how to reach her. “Here in the U.K., we have due process, the rule of law, and a tradition of fair play,” she said, asserting that she would cooperate with any legitimate inquiry but would not tolerate politically motivated attacks.

Denouncing Political Motives

The Labour Party politician strongly condemned what she called a “witch-hunt” and an attempt to undermine her credibility. She suggested that the allegations might be politically motivated, aimed at distracting from internal issues in Bangladesh.

“I will not be drawn into dirty politics, nor allow their witch-hunt to undermine my work as a British citizen and proud member of the U.K. Parliament,” Siddiq declared, making it clear that she would not let the allegations interfere with her parliamentary responsibilities.

The controversy surrounding Siddiq’s allegations raises questions about the relationship between Bangladesh’s authorities and international figures, as well as the role of media narratives in shaping political discourse. While the Bangladesh government has not yet officially responded to Siddiq’s claims, the situation continues to draw significant attention in both the U.K. and Bangladesh.

Bangladesh’s Bizarre Ride on the Donkey’s Back

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

By Aminul Haque
Bangladesh finds itself in freefall—gripped by lawlessness, surging violence against women and minorities, political suppression, press censorship, and a dangerous rise in religious extremism. Just when the nation is gasping for relief, the interim government led by Dr. Muhammad Yunus has chosen to distract with a medieval-style Eid-ul-Fitr procession in Dhaka—an event that has ignited a storm of outrage online.
One image from this spectacle has gone viral: a portrayal of Nasiruddin Hodja, the legendary folk character, sitting backwards on a donkey. Social media is ablaze with theories—some see the figure as Dr. Yunus himself, others as Jamaat-e-Islami leader Shafiqul Islam, and some as a grotesque fusion of both. The message is deafeningly clear: under Dr. Yunus’s leadership, Bangladesh is moving backwards at breakneck speed.
Pressing the ‘Reset’ Button—Or Erasing History?
Upon seizing power, Dr. Yunus declared his intent to hit the ‘reset’ button on Bangladesh’s past. But the past eight months have laid bare his true mission: dismantling the nation’s secular, inclusive foundations. His administration’s actions paint a chilling picture of regression.
Bangladesh’s longstanding foreign policy— ‘friendship with all, malice toward none’—is now under siege. Since independence, the country has carefully navigated its diplomatic ties. Yet, even before taking office, Dr. Yunus openly antagonized India with inflammatory remarks about the Seven Sisters states. Now, his administration is doubling down on anti-India rhetoric—a reckless move that might pander to nationalist sentiments in the short term but poses a grave threat to regional stability. His overtures to China, inviting Beijing to expand business in India’s northeastern states, are only fanning the flames.
Former Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee once wisely said, ‘You can change your friends, but not your neighbours.’ Diplomacy demands pragmatism, yet Dr. Yunus seems more interested in stoking hostility than fostering cooperation.
From Zero Tolerance to Terrorist Playground?
Under Sheikh Hasina’s leadership, Bangladesh was hailed for its zero-tolerance approach to terrorism, successfully keeping extremist groups at bay. Yet, within eight months of Dr. Yunus’s tenure, the international community now dreads that Bangladesh might devolve into the next Afghanistan. A recent New York Times exposé highlights how Islamic extremists see new opportunities in Bangladesh under the current government—a claim dismissed as biased by authorities yet corroborated by alarming ground realities. Radical factions like Hizb ut-Tahrir, once suppressed, have resurged with newfound audacity, while religious minorities and secular symbols are ruthlessly targeted. No amount of deflection can erase the truth: Bangladesh is sliding into extremism, and the world is watching in horror.
Women’s Rights: From Progress to Persecution
Once an Asian trailblazer in women’s empowerment, Bangladesh is now witnessing a terrifying surge in gender-based violence. Women live in fear as self-appointed morality enforcers dictate dress codes and social behaviour, emboldened by a government unwilling to intervene. In a chilling display of impunity, violent mobs have stormed police stations to free sexual offenders while threatening their victims into silence. The message is unmistakable: in Dr. Yunus’s Bangladesh, women must submit—or suffer.
A Government for the People—Or a Personal Looting Machine?
As the country spirals, the ruling elite are thriving. Dr. Yunus and his clique of ‘coordinators’ have transformed governance into a shameless profiteering scheme. Judicial oversight has been bulldozed, state institutions bullied into submission, and corruption reigns supreme. Their brazen motto? ‘We have access to everything.’
And how convenient—Dr. Yunus has erased all legal cases against himself, including a jaw-dropping tax evasion scandal involving 6.66 billion taka. He has secured tax exemptions for his companies, acquired permits for a private hospital and a university, and is even reportedly eyeing a liquor license. Meanwhile, his inner circle—once struggling student leaders—now flaunt luxury cars and five-star lifestyles. The rot runs deep.
Echoes of the Past
Decades ago, former dictator Hussain Muhammad Ershad attempted to appease religious hardliners by importing camels from Pakistan, sparking scenes of absurdity. Inspired by this folly, poet Shamsur Rahman penned his iconic poem, ‘Riding the Strange Camel’, a scathing critique of the nation’s blind surrender to fanaticism.
Were he alive today, he might have penned an even darker sequel: ‘Bangladesh in Reverse: A Nation on the Donkey’s Back.’


(Former Diplomat and Security Analyst)

Bangladesh’s suicidal decision to buy Pakistani Junk fighter jets – United People will stop it

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

Tipu Chowdhury

If the unelected government named Charkhar is playing tricks with foreigners by sacrificing the country’s interests at this moment, then there is a possibility that it will be canceled and
invalidated later. The country’s constitution has not given such power to anyone or any group. No conscious politicians are now saying anything about the acceptability of all the agreements being made with foreigners, because here too, there is a hint of foreign lobbying, military and defense departments and their involvement. I will talk about the division of shares later.

Bangladesh must remember that Pakistan and India will divide Bangladesh into two parts to achieve their interests, whether today or tomorrow. Pakistan will be quick and extremely vindictive in this. India will not sit idly by if Pakistan interferes. India, which is sitting on its neck, will be more capable of achieving its interests than Pakistan. China will make its trade benefits permanent in the middle, and in this tripartite region, to achieve and control America’s interests, a toilet will be needed in this region, its name is Bangladesh. The toilet is currently jammed. No plumber is coming to work.

Especially Pakistan is a traitorous nation that has been tested by Bangladesh in many states of its own country.

Here is a picture of Bangladesh’s import export trade deficit with Pakistan-
*Trade Difference (Surplus/Deficit:
*Pakistan’s trade surplus is $690M (exports) – $58.6M (imports) $631.4 million.
*Bangladesh’s trade deficit: 58.6M (exports) – $690M (imports) = *$631.4 million.
Trends and Context:
Over the past five years (2018-2023), Pakistan’s exports to Bangladesh have declined by an annual *!2.5%, while Bangladesh’s exports to Pakistan have declined by an annual 4.11%.
Bilateral trade between both countries has declined since 2018, reflecting broader economic challenges such as Pakistan’s reliance on cotton exports and Bangladesh’s focus on jute and pharmaceuticals.
Pakistan’s exports are largely dependent on textiles, while Bangladesh’s exports are diversified But smaller in size.

Comparative economic performance: Bangladesh’s total exports reached $54.5 billion in 2023, more than Pakistan’s $35.8 billion, but this disparity does not apply to their bilateral trade.
Pakistan faces structural problems such as high debt (77.29% of GDP) and inflation (21%), while Bangladesh has strong reserves ($31 billion vs. Pakistan’s $4 billion) and a higher growth rate (7.5% vs. 3.5%).

Let’s get to the main point – Bangladesh is strategically diverting the attention of the Bangladeshi people from Pakistan to a different sector, rolling out the red carpet with China and hiding behind the cloak of a black gown.

Bangladesh is going to sign a deal to purchase not one or two but 32 fighter jets from Pakistan. The Bangladeshi delegation’s visit to Pakistan is over and soon Pakistan’s military and political leaders are coming to Bangladesh to take a firm decision on this matter. The intellectuals of Bangladesh are now wearing masks and going crazy with the country hijackers.

Patriotism and business are not the same. Bangladesh should not buy any fighter jets or war materials from India and Pakistan whose remote control will be in the hands of others. The funny thing is that India is not opposing this. They have the keys to it. Since the main engines of JF17 Thunder are Russian and therefore we are hostages here too. Myanmar had earlier bought 7 JF17 Thunder from Pakistan, now they are grounded tin.
The Bangladesh Air Force will operate the fighter jets, but they do not seem to have any interest or participation in this procurement process. Another group of the Bangladesh Army is deciding on the purchase and contract. It remains to be seen how seriously the Army Chief views the matter.

Will we have to sit in Pakistan’s lap by trying our best to be anti-India, and that too by sacrificing the country’s interests?
There is no point in Pakistan buying all these tin boxes from Bangladesh in the middle of China. Although this fighter jet started its journey in 2003, its test flight was in 2008. So far, 175 of these fighter jets have been manufactured, most of which are grounded and rest off highly maintained.
If buying each one for 25 million dollars is a burden on the nation, it is better if it is a better modern one at a slightly higher price. Buying a fighter jet is not a big deal, its pilot training, training, long-range strategic planning, equipment and
maintenance, exercises and operations costs are close to that. At the moment, Pakistan, Myanmar,
Azerbaijan and Nigeria are using this fighter jet.

It will take 9600 crore taka, that is 800 million US dollars, to buy 32 such fighter jets and another 150 million temporary budget will have to be kept for ready to operations. After that, we have our right hand, left hand and excuses.
At the moment, the most needed thing in Bangladesh’s engineering universities is for talented students to study in the fields of Artificial Intelligence, Robotics Science & Technology, Drone Technology, Radar Technology, Anti aircraft, Long and short range missile, etc. Modern planning, infrastructure, joint projects, research, laboratories, development, training, etc. A budget of at least 500-1000 crore taka is needed. However, our politicians and military experts (in fact!) do not think about any budget other than their own business budget. They may not think that the next generation of wars will be fought by sitting in bunkers and pressing buttons. They are still unable to get out of their piles of guns and sticks. Besides, there are clashes everywhere in the country.

The people of the country will expect that if there is no constitutional recognition and accountability for any such agreement and purchase, then the people of this country will not accept any such agreement and purchase with the tax money of the people of Bangladesh. Whatever needs to be done for that will be done. Therefore, all the devils disguised as saints, monks, patriots, beware.
Dear readers, preparations are underway for Bangladesh to purchase this fighter jet from Pakistan on relevant issues. I have had to study a lot on this issue in the last few days. I am presenting some information to you on this issue. Then it will be convenient for you to take a decision and protest.
If the missile launched from the fighter jet that Bangladesh is purchasing does not reach the distance of 250 miles from Dhaka to Chittagong, then for some reason it will reach India and Myanmar. To launch a missile from this fighter jet, you have to be 200 miles away from the enemy’s territory. That means that if you attack it, the chances of it coming back are very low. The aircraft, the pilots of the aircraft, the country’s money and the people’s paddy fields are all gone. Bangladesh should not be forgotten. If war is unlikely, then any cantonment and city in Bangladesh is within the missile target of India and Myanmar. Now let’s see what this fighter jet can do. The missile launch range of the JF-17 Thunder Fighter varies depending on the type of missile. Here is a detailed description of its main armament and their approximate range:
Air-to-Air Missiles (AAMs)
1.PL-5 E Short-Range Infrared
Range: 20 km
A heat-seeking missile for close combat, comparable to the AIM-9 Sidewinder.

2.SD-10 (PL-12) (Beyond Visual Range)
Range: 70-100 km
A radar-guided missile for medium to long-range combat. It is the primary BVR missile for the earlier JF-17 block.

3.PL-15 (Advanced Long-Range)
Range: 150-200 km

JF-17 block This missile has an active radar seeker and is designed to counter advanced threats such as the Meteor missile. It significantly increases the aircraft’s BVR capabilities.

Air-to-Surface Missiles:

  1. C-802AK Anti-Ship Missile:
    Range:180 km
    A sea-skimming missile for maritime attacks.
  2. CM-802AKG (Man-in-the-Loop):
    Range:230 km
    A land-attack variant with extended range and precision guidance.
  3. Ra’ad ALCM (Air-Launched Cruise Missile):
    Range:350 km
    A standoff weapon for tactical targets.
  4. MAR-1 Anti-Radiation Missile:
    Range:25-60 km
    Targets enemy radar installations.

Guided Bomb:
LS6 Glide Bomb: 50-60 km. Satellite-guided with standoff range. GBU10/12 Laser Guided Bomb: Effective within 10-15 km of the target.

Please click and have a look at this link for info and system Deka Ironwork Simulations OR PAC Kamra .

Last question: With the approval of which needs and plans, the acceptability of the proposals of which approved domestic and foreign expert panels,
analysis, through which tender verification and state decisions, is this self-destructive anti-national initiative being taken to hand over the money of Bangladeshis to defeated Pakistan? The people of Bangladesh want to know today and want to resist the evil conspirators and looters.

Author:
Tipu Chowdhury
History, Society-Generation and Politics Analyst
Boston,USA

Is Yunus supporting India? Is crusade against India over?

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

Shamima Choudhury

It is interesting that the head of the Bangladesh Interim government Dr. M. Yunus, a Nobel Laureate is now appears to be supporting India against whom he and his extremist students groups have launched a jehad, an all out crusade against India and anything of India. They are boycotting visiting India, they are boycotting the Indian products, and as a show of unity, they burned down a few Indian merchandise publicly at rallies. One of Dr. Yunus chief media advisers Pinaki Bhattacherjee, stationed in France, started an all out crusade against India for many months. He is being echoed by Dr. Yunus’s two Cabinet members, Mahfuz Alam and Asif Mahmud Shabuj and his Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam that anything Indian must be boycotted.

Map of New Bangladesh: it includes 10 states of India

His Cabinet Adviser Mahfuz Alam whom Dr. Yunus fondly introduced at the UN as the “meticulous designer of the August Uprising” drew a new map of Bangladesh that includes 10 states of India, a greater Bangladesh and reportedly drones and missiles were mobilized to the Bangladesh-India borders. Not only that, it created so much euphoria that many ex-army officers claimed that they could capture Kolkata, West Bengal’s capital in four hours. More importantly, the employers of Dr. Yunus as the Chief Advisor, namely the student leaders of the anti-discrimination movement of July-August, 2024 namely M/S Nahid Islam, Sarjis Alam, and Hasnath Abdullah (he wants to become the nation’s Army Chief by replacing the current one) are deadly opposed to India. They squarely blame India for anything wrong or evil in Bangladesh. The government media reported that the proposed 142-story iconic high-rise building that was proposed to be built by an American medical business man, Dr. Kaliprodip Chowdhury was also denied to do it as India opposed it. During the BNP rule in 1991-96 and 2001-06, Dr. Chowdhury tried to build a modern hospital in Dhaka but his proposal was not accepted. Afterwards, he built a 750-bed hospital in West Bengal of India. Possibly in both the cases his proposals were not accepted as he refused to pay bribes to the government officials. He is an American businessman and since he is a successful ‘brown businessman’, the US government monitors all his investment very closely. By giving bribes to Bangladesh officials he does not like to endanger his multi-billion dollar business in the USA. However, the Yunus media promoters are portraying that his high rise building proposal in Dhaka was rejected as the Indian government opposed it.

India bashing is the talk of the town

Everyday the Bangladesh media is full of India bashing. And its young leaders are deadly against keeping any relationship with India. They wanted the government to stop importing essential items like rice, wheat, sugar, edible oil, onion, potato, energy, etc from India and instead to import these items from Pakistan, Turkey, China and Brazil even at a higher price. Nowadays, it is reported in the media that the Pakistani ships are bringing food items plus weapons to Bangladesh without any inspection at the ports. Dr. Yunus’ Adviser for flood and environmental issues, Ms. Rizwana Hasan, a Cabinet member often blames India for floods in Bangladesh and she led a rally and a long march on the Teestha river barrage project. To reduce dependence on India for water sharing and also to teach India a good lesson, they have been proposing to build the Teestha barrage project . The ever active media office of Dr. Yunus gave hope to the nation that the Chinese government would be sending a Chinese aircraft to take Dr. Yunus to Beijing to finalize the Teestha barrage project during his visit. It is reported that the Chinese government would finance it and also build it. Earlier, India showed interest in undertaking a joint feasibility study on the project.

Bangladesh media projecting depression in India due to strain relationship

During the past government of Sheikh Hasina, as the relationship between Bangladesh and India was friendly not hostile, few hundred thousand Bangladeshis used to visit India routinely either as tourists, or for medical treatment or for shopping. Medical treatment is not only better but also much cheaper in India vis-a-vis Bangladesh or Thailand. No wonder the year before last year, nearly 28,00,000 (28 lakh) Bangladeshis visited India. Now the Yunus government in spite of the language barrier has made arrangements with the Chinese government to send Bangladeshis to China for their medical treatment. Here at home, the Bangladesh government media projecting a sharp economic depression in the West Bengal retail business and closure of many medical facilities in India due to the dearth of medical patients from Bangladesh.

SAARC Vs. BIMSTEC: BIMSTEC an Indian Initiative

Since the regional organization the SAARC: the South Asia Association of Regional Cooperation, an organization of 8 countries of South Asia is virtually dead due to rivalries between Pakistan and India, Dr. Yunus on his becoming the Chief Advisor undertook special initiatives to revive it. He met Pakistan’s Prime Minister a couple of times and emphasized strengthening the SAARC.

To avoid Pakistan, at the initiative of India BIMSTEC, a regional organization for economic cooperation consisting of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand was formed and its Secretariat is in Bangladesh. The current Director General of it is an Indian diplomat. Dr. Yunus would be attending its Summit in Thailand this week.

While the Yunus government and its supporters and employers are deadly against India and all Indian initiatives, but surprisingly, Dr. Yunus is attending it.

The critics argue that whenever he gets an invitation to attend any international or multilateral meetings, he always loves to join them as it is his hobby. The others argue, it might give him an opportunity for Photo Ops to have a picture with the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. India being the largest democracy always on principle encourages democratic governments rather than military or civil military-technocratic governments. Since the Yunus government is neither a constitutional government nor does it have the people’s mandate, it is reluctant to negotiate issues with a non-democratic temporary government like that of Dr. Yunus. India is not alone. In fact, most of the countries are reluctant to invest in Bangladesh as the current Yunus government is unstable and shaky. Moreover, under the patronage of the Yunus government the jehadis and religious extremists are trying to take over the country, establish an Islamic Caliphate, and they already created total lawlessness and anarchy in the country. Yunus government released all the jehadis and terrorists from jails and they under the banner of banned terrorist organization the “Hijbut Tahir” recently organized public demonstrations in the main thoroughfares of Bangladesh. Under the Draconian media control and under the government’s the “Operation Devil Hunt” no one is allowed to criticize the government nor can publish any negative story on the Yunus government. Many journalists are in jails. However, the investors know it and therefore, they are shifting their investments abroad.

Dr. Yunus China trip failed

Dr. Yunus went to China with lots of hope, unfortunately, except assurances, China did not commit anything substantial to him. He reiterated what the Sheikh Hasina government stated in the past that Bangladesh believes in the One-China policy and it demanded to reduce interest rates on credits. Although there is nothing new, his media wing stated that China granted them tariff-free facilities, agreed to import mangoes from Bangladesh, and agreed to provide a $2.1 billion credit facility. They agreed to provide tariff-free facilities to 98% exportables of Bangladesh including RMG in 2020, they agreed to buy mangoes a year before last year. When Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Bangladesh in 2016, they signed nearly $23 billion worth of credit in the government sector and another $13 billion worth in the private sector totalling $36 billion in 2016. Unfortunately, so far Bangladesh actually received around $5 billion only as the Hasina government was very prudent in accepting foreign loans and credits.

Is it possible that since the Chinese government showed a cold shoulder, Dr. Yunus felt an urgency to improve its relationship with India and therefore, in spite of so much opposition by his supporters and employers, he is determined to attend the BIMSTEC summit this week?

Indian Leader Threatens to Break Up Bangladesh

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

Pradyot Manikya Debbarma, the leader of India’s Tripura Motha Party, has strongly reacted to a recent statement by Bangladesh’s chief adviser, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, and even threatened to break up Bangladesh.

In a social media post on Tuesday, Debbarma stated that instead of improving connectivity between Northeast India and the rest of the country, India should take control of Bangladesh’s Chattogram region. He claimed that this would eliminate geographical isolation and provide the northeastern states with a direct seaport.

Dr. Yunus, during a recent visit to China, had remarked that the northeastern states of India, known as the Seven Sisters, are landlocked and have no direct access to the sea, making Bangladesh their only maritime gateway. He suggested that this could be an economic opportunity for China as well.

In response, Assam’s Chief Minister, Himanta Biswa Sarma, stated that Yunus’ remarks highlighted India’s strategic vulnerability regarding the Siliguri Corridor, also known as the “Chicken’s Neck.” He urged the central government to strengthen road and rail networks in the area.

Following Sarma’s reaction, Debbarma escalated the rhetoric by suggesting that India should reclaim Chattogram with the support of indigenous groups in Bangladesh’s Chattogram Hill Tracts. He argued that India’s biggest mistake was allowing Chattogram to become part of Pakistan in 1947, despite its indigenous population wanting to join India.

He further claimed that instead of spending billions on infrastructure, India could break up Bangladesh to secure access to the sea. He mentioned that millions of Tripura, Garo, Khasi, and Chakma people live in Bangladesh and would support such a move for their own interests.

Chattogram is approximately 75 kilometers from Tripura, and Debbarma asserted that reclaiming it would correct a historical mistake.

The Rise of Islamist Extremism in Bangladesh: Political Instability and Global Influences

Dastagir Jahangir
-
0

Bangladesh, once celebrated for its tolerance and multiculturalism, is now facing a growing threat of Islamist extremism. This surge in radical ideology is being fueled by political instability, economic disparities, and the strategic maneuvering of both domestic and international players. The evolving situation raises questions about the roles of key figures such as Nobel laureate Dr. Muhammad Yunus and the influence of global powers like China and the United States.

Growing Islamist Extremism and Political Instability
A recent report by The New York Times highlights the increasing influence of Islamist extremist groups in Bangladesh. These groups are steadily challenging the country’s democratic framework, taking advantage of weakened governance and political divisions. Despite efforts by the government to suppress these factions, the situation remains volatile. At times, the ruling establishment has been accused of leveraging these groups for political gains, adding further complexity to the crisis.

Muhammad Yunus and His Controversial Remarks
Dr. Muhammad Yunus, an internationally acclaimed figure and close ally of Western policymakers, has recently found himself at the center of controversy. During a visit to China, Yunus suggested that Bangladesh serves as the only maritime gateway for India’s northeastern states and implied that this could facilitate China’s economic expansion. These remarks have raised alarms among Indian policymakers, who are increasingly wary of China’s growing presence in the Indo-Pacific region. His statements have fueled concerns over Bangladesh’s strategic alignment and the potential repercussions on regional stability.

The Role of Global Powers
As Bangladesh grapples with rising extremism and political turbulence, global powers continue to exert their influence. The United States, particularly the Democratic Party leadership, has historically supported Yunus, while China is actively expanding its economic footprint in the region. Meanwhile, India remains cautious about developments in Bangladesh, given its strategic significance in South Asian geopolitics. The interplay of these forces will significantly shape Bangladesh’s future trajectory.

The rise of Islamist extremism in Bangladesh, coupled with political instability and international interventions, has placed the country at a crossroads. While the government struggles to maintain control, the actions of influential figures like Yunus and the strategic interests of global powers will play a crucial role in shaping Bangladesh’s future. The coming years will determine whether the nation can reclaim its legacy of tolerance and stability or succumb to the pressures of extremism and external influence.

Dastagir Jahangir Editor The Voice

1...417418419...424Page 418 of 424