WEST PALM BEACH, Florida – President-elect Donald Trump has revived controversial proposals to retake control of the Panama Canal and purchase Greenland, signaling a bold and unconventional approach to U.S. foreign policy ahead of his Jan 20 inauguration.
Speaking in Arizona on Dec 22, Trump claimed the U.S. should “reassert control” over the Panama Canal, accusing Panama of overcharging shippers and warning of potential Chinese influence. Panamanian officials strongly denied the allegations, with Panama City Mayor Mayer Mizrachi Matalon declaring, “We are not, nor will we ever be, a 51st state.”
Trump also reiterated his desire for the U.S. to own Greenland, which is controlled by Denmark, citing its growing strategic importance due to climate change and Arctic trade routes. Advisers close to Trump have explored scenarios for U.S. involvement, including a potential Compact of Free Association should Greenland seek independence from Denmark.
“America First” Meets Global Brinkmanship
Defenders of Trump’s “America First” policies argue his provocative rhetoric is intended to bolster U.S. leverage. Ms. Victoria Coates, a former national security official, emphasized that Trump views these actions as safeguarding American interests, even at the cost of upsetting allies.
Critics, however, warn that Trump’s combative style risks alienating key partners, potentially driving allies like Panama and Denmark closer to adversaries such as China and Russia.
Strategic Concerns and Domestic Pressure
China’s influence in Latin America is believed to be a major motivator for Trump’s Panama comments. Though Beijing does not control the canal, Chinese companies manage ports at its Caribbean and Pacific entrances, and China is the second-largest canal user.
Trump’s statements about Canada have further strained relations with U.S. neighbors. While touting Canada as a possible “51st state” may lack serious intent, experts suggest Trump’s rhetoric reflects pressure tactics on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, whom he accuses of inadequate cooperation on trade, migration, and drug enforcement.
Trump’s foreign policy advisors have downplayed fears of instability, framing his tactics as part of broader strategic negotiations to solidify U.S. power globally. Meanwhile, critics like former National Security Advisor John Bolton caution that Trump’s outspokenness undermines legitimate discussions on international issues.
The incoming administration has not responded to requests for comment.