In a candid and forthright address at the 19th Nani A Palkhivala Memorial Lecture in Mumbai, India’s External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar, delivered a scathing critique of Pakistan, emphasizing how its support for cross-border terrorism has backfired, now eroding its own political fabric. Jaishankar’s remarks shed light on the deep-seated tensions between India and Pakistan, which have historically been marred by issues of terrorism, territorial disputes, and mutual distrust.
Jaishankar took the audience through a historical narrative where he recounted India’s efforts post-partition to mend and rebuild relationships with its neighbors, including Pakistan. He highlighted India’s approach as one of generosity, offering assistance without expecting reciprocation. This included significant support during natural disasters and financial crises, funding for connectivity projects, and promoting trade and investment in the region.
However, the minister made clear distinctions when it came to Pakistan, pointing out that despite India’s overtures, Pakistan’s persistent patronage of terrorism across the border has been a significant impediment to any meaningful rapprochement. He described this support as akin to a “cancer” that has not only been detrimental to regional peace but is now consuming Pakistan’s own political structure. This metaphor was used to illustrate how the very elements Pakistan has nurtured for strategic gains are now destabilizing its internal political landscape.
Jaishankar’s address also touched upon the broader implications of such policies on regional stability. He underscored India’s strategic patience, suggesting that true stability in South Asia would require a shift in Pakistan’s policy towards terrorism. He advocated for cooperative initiatives that would benefit all parties, like support for energy, rail, and road connectivity projects, alongside enhancing cultural and people-to-people contacts.
The minister’s comments are particularly poignant at a time when India is navigating complex regional dynamics, aiming to assert itself as a responsible power while fostering an environment conducive to peace and economic growth. Jaishankar’s critique serves not only as a reflection on past and present policies but also as a stern warning about the future, where the well-being of Pakistan’s political health might be contingent on its decisions regarding terrorism.
This lecture, named after Nani A Palkhivala, a renowned Indian jurist and economist known for his contributions to constitutional law and economic policy, provided a fitting platform for such a discourse, emphasizing the intersection of law, economics, and international relations in shaping a nation’s foreign policy. Jaishankar’s words resonate as a call for introspection and change, not just for Pakistan but for all nations dealing with the scourge of terrorism.