Hundreds of US diplomats from the State Department and the US Agency for International Development (USAID) have sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, protesting the dismantling of USAID. The diplomats argue that shutting down the agency would weaken US global leadership, harm national security, and create opportunities for China and Russia to expand their influence.
The letter, filed through the department’s internal “dissent channel,” criticizes the Trump administration’s decision to freeze nearly all foreign aid on January 20, jeopardizing the safety of American diplomats and military personnel abroad and endangering millions who rely on US aid.
Over 700 diplomats signed the letter, expressing concerns that halting and terminating foreign aid contracts without thorough review could damage alliances, erode trust, and allow adversaries to gain ground. The Trump administration’s “America First” agenda led to a 90-day suspension of all foreign aid, halting crucial USAID operations worldwide and disrupting humanitarian efforts.
The letter highlights the suffering caused by the freeze, stating, “The freeze on life-saving aid has already caused irreparable harm and suffering to millions of people around the world.” Despite claims of waivers for critical programs, funding remains blocked.
The administration, led by President Trump and his adviser Elon Musk, aims to eliminate USAID as part of broader efforts to cut federal spending. They argue that foreign aid is wasteful, while the letter counters that it is a strategic tool for regional stability, conflict prevention, and advancing US interests.
In fiscal year 2023, the US provided $72 billion in aid for initiatives ranging from women’s health in conflict zones to HIV/AIDS treatment and anti-corruption programs. However, nearly 5,800 of 6,200 multi-year awards, valued at $54 billion, were cut, leading to widespread layoffs and financial hardships for contractors and implementing partners.
Contractors affected by the cuts have sued the administration, arguing the move is unlawful and that funds were cut off even for completed work. The US Supreme Court recently upheld a lower court ruling requiring the government to release overdue payments to these organizations.
A State Department spokesperson declined to comment on the leaked letter, maintaining the department’s policy of not discussing internal communications.