Authorities in Guangzhou, southern China, have announced a reward for information leading to the capture of over 20 individuals allegedly involved in a cyberattack on a technology company in the city. The public security bureau claims these suspects are connected to Taiwan’s “Information, Communications and Electronic Force Command” (ICEFCOM) and were acting under the direction of Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The bureau has published their names, photographs, and Taiwan identity card numbers, offering a reward of 10,000 yuan (approximately $1,390) for information leading to each suspect’s arrest.  
The cyberattack, which occurred on May 20, 2025, was described by the authorities as a large-scale, coordinated assault with hallmarks of cyber warfare, far beyond the capabilities of ordinary hackers. The attack reportedly targeted critical sectors in China, including military, aerospace, energy, and government agencies, as well as institutions in Hong Kong and Macau. Chinese officials allege that the operation was part of a broader effort by Taiwan’s ICEFCOM, in cooperation with U.S. intelligence agencies, to destabilize China through cognitive warfare and cyber operations.  
Taipei has strongly rejected these accusations, calling them baseless and politically motivated. The Taiwanese government asserts that Beijing is attempting to divert international attention from its own cyber activities, which have faced criticism from various countries and organizations. Taiwan’s defense ministry has labeled the allegations as intimidation and coercion by the Chinese regime.  
The release of personal information and the offer of monetary rewards for information leading to the suspects’ capture have raised concerns among human rights organizations and international observers. Critics argue that such actions could be used to suppress dissent and target individuals based on their political affiliations. 
As tensions continue to rise between China and Taiwan, this incident underscores the increasing use of cyber capabilities in geopolitical conflicts and the challenges of ensuring accountability and transparency in cyberspace.