A group of 500 lawyers has issued a strong protest against what they described as a “mockery of justice” in the verdict delivered by the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on 17 November 2025. In a joint press statement released on 29 November, the lawyers expressed deep concern over what they termed a breach of judicial independence and fundamental legal norms.
The statement criticized the tribunal’s procedures, alleging that the trial failed to ensure the basic requirements of justice — neutrality, the opportunity for the defence to present arguments without obstruction, and the absence of bias from those involved in the judicial process. The lawyers argue that the verdict disregarded these standards, resulting in a process that undermined the accused’s right to a fair hearing.
They further noted that the presiding official of the ICT had previously served in the prosecution of a militant organisation and, therefore, should not have overseen the proceedings due to conflict of interest. This, they claim, raises questions about neutrality and compromises the credibility of the verdict.
The protesting lawyers also highlighted what they described as the current “politicized pressure” and an “environment of fear” surrounding the trial process. They warned that such conditions erode trust in the judicial system and threaten democratic accountability.
According to the statement, the verdict represents a “clear deviation” from established legal standards, constitutional guarantees, and international human rights obligations. The lawyers condemned the ruling, calling it unacceptable and unlawful.
They concluded by urging the authorities to withdraw the verdict delivered on 28 November 2025 and reaffirmed their firm rejection of what they see as a politically influenced and unjust judicial process.
