Journalists Condemn ICT Verdict Against Sheikh Hasina

Date:

London, UK — A group of UK-based Bangladeshi progressive journalists has issued a joint statement strongly condemning the International Crimes Tribunal’s (ICT) recent verdict against Bangladesh’s Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The journalists expressed “deep concern” over what they described as a politically motivated judgment delivered in absentia, raising questions about its legality and transparency.

The statement, endorsed by dozens of Bangladeshi-origin journalists working in the UK’s print, electronic, and online media, claims the verdict has created “shock and frustration” among expatriate Bangladeshis and the global rights community.

Allegations of Political Retaliation

The journalists argue that the charges brought against Sheikh Hasina — accusing her of involvement in human rights violations — are based on “illusory narratives” crafted by the current political establishment in Bangladesh. They state that the verdict not only undermines judicial integrity but also threatens the country’s democratic environment.

Referring to reactions from international human rights watchdogs, the statement highlighted that Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) expressed reservations over the fairness of the trial, calling it an “in absentia political prosecution lacking due process.”

Concerns Over Rule of Law and Judicial Abuse

According to the journalists, the verdict represents a serious erosion of the rule of law in Bangladesh. They warn that such politically driven legal actions could further destabilize Bangladesh’s already fragile political and social landscape.

They noted that the trial’s “lack of transparency” and “political bias” undermines the credibility of Bangladesh’s judicial system and contradicts globally accepted legal standards.

Call for Global Support to Protect Democratic Rights

The group urged the international community—including global media, rights organizations, and diplomatic actors—to closely monitor the situation in Bangladesh. They emphasized that democratic values and human rights must be protected from political exploitation.

They asserted that any verdict passed without ensuring full legal rights and defense representation “will not stand the test of fair justice.”

Endorsers of the Statement

More than 50 journalists, researchers, editors, broadcasters, and writers signed the joint statement. The signatories include senior correspondents from London-based media outlets, Bangladeshi community media, television channels, and digital platforms.

They collectively reaffirmed their commitment to “standing against judicial oppression” and supporting democratic freedoms in Bangladesh.

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Bitcoin Falls Nearly 2% as Renewed US-Iran Tensions Weigh on Crypto Market

Bitcoin fell nearly 2% to drop below $62,800 as intensifying geopolitical tensions between the United States and Iran dampened investor appetite for digital assets.

More Than 10,000 Die Across Europe as Extreme Heatwave Sweeps Continent

A deadly June heatwave claimed over 10,000 lives across Europe, primarily impacting those aged 65 and above, as Copernicus confirms record-shattering regional temperatures.

Trump Reimposes Naval Blockade on Iran, Seeks 20% Fee for Hormuz Protection

US President Donald Trump announced a naval blockade on Iran and a 20% security fee on transit cargo through the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions after recent military clashes.

Up to 1.6 Million Migrants Could Qualify for Faster UK Settlement After Policy Reversal

The UK is preparing to scrap a proposal extending the ILR wait to 10 years for post-Brexit migrants, keeping the 5-year permanent residency route for 1.6 million people.